| |
Fantasy
Mailbag 8/27/05
by Ray Flowers
August 27, 2005
I play in a league where our lineups include
four SPs and two RP. I have Rich Harden, Matt Morris, Zach
Duke, Mark Mulder, Tim Hudson, John Lackey, John Patterson, and
Kris Benson on my roster. For relievers, I use Francisco Rodriguez
and Eddie Guardado each week. I was offered Jason Isringhausen and
Chipper Jones for Guardado and Duke. Should I take it?
Joe, Duluth, Minnesota
Chipper has suffered his share of injuries this year,
but he has done very well when he has been in the lineup, especially
since the all-star break (.341-6-22-15 in 27 games). I would however
be a little wary of counting on him to be an everyday player at
this point since his shoulder injury makes it real difficult for
him to throw (hes on pace for a career low in games played).
Izzy has been racking up the saves, 33 and counting, despite
working on his highest WHIP since 2000 (1.25). Funny thing, he is
also working on a career low ERA (1.84), so it just goes to show
you that relievers ratios can be a bit deceiving because they pitch
so few innings.
Duke has been a revelation in Pittsburgh becoming just the
second Pirate ever to begin his career 5-0. While Duke does have
a 1.81 ERA and 1.17 WHIP he just injured his ankle and is likely
to miss at lest one start. Since he is a young, the Pirates might
use this injury as a reason to curtail his innings. Plus rookies
often struggle a bit when the league gets a book on
them. Guardado has very quietly put together a great season
in the Pacific Northwest (1-1, 1.47 ERA, 0.91 WHIP and 29 SV). Everyday
Eddie seems to have fully recovered from his shoulder issues
and has pitched like a champ all year.
The Izzy for Guardado portion of the trade is a coin flip as far
as SV go, but Guardado trumps Izzy in ERA, WHIP, though we are kind
of splitting hairs here since the differences are really rather
minimal considering the number of innings they pitch. It appears
to me that you really dont need Duke at this point since you
have a very strong group of SPs, plus his recent struggles
and his current injury make his status going forward a bit murky.
I would say that any team could use Chipper, especially since he
qualifies at 3B an OF in most leagues, so I would give this trade
offer some serious consideration despite Chippers injury struggles.
At the end of the day, I would accept it.
Are Melvin Mora and Brian Roberts going to produce any significant
numbers in the last few months of the season, or should they be
dealt while their overall numbers remain high?
Tim, Ridgefield, Connecticut
Well Tim lets review before I answer this question.
Recall March 25th
your sitting in a room with all your buddies
and you still dont have a 2B. You realize its getting might
close to the time where your gonna pull back on a six pack and review
how your draft went when you decide to take a chance on Roberts
in the 15th round of your mixed draft. What the heck, he scored
107 Runs and had 29 SB in 2004, so you feel that hes a pretty
good value at this point.
Flash forward to July 12th at the all-star break. Your 15th round
gamble has been the story of the first half of the AL season with
staggering numbers: .345-15-49-56-18 (not to mention a 1.007 OPS).
Is this guy the second coming of Rogers Hornsby?
Flash forward to today. People seem to think that Roberts is the
worst player ever. Sure he has struggled since the break (.243-2-12-21-7
in 38 games) but is that really surprising? Roberts isnt a
.345, 30/30 hitter, he is a quality 2B/leadoff hitter. Roberts has
already set career highs in HR/RBI, and is well on pace to surpass
his career highs in Runs/Hits/SB/AVG/OBP/SLG/OPS. Will he rebound
to his first half levels? No way. Is he worth more in a trade at
this point than keeping him on your roster? Possibly. Will he be
a useful fantasy player the rest of the season? I wouldnt
bet against it since he still will score runs and garner you some
SB. But everyone should give this guy a break, he has been a fantastic
bargain this year.
Mora, well hes a different story. The last two years
it can be argued that he, and not Arod, has been the most
valuable 3B in baseball based on what you had to pay for him on
draft day (his average the past 2 years has been a spectacular .331-21-76-80).
Mora, along with the whole Orioles team, has really struggled
lately. In fact, Mora has been pretty awful lately. In his last
35 games he is hitting .238-1-10-11 and hasnt hit an HR since
July 15th. He has an injury to his ankle that he is dealing with,
but he has shown the last two years that he is a much better hitter
than this. However, in his career he is a substantially worse post-break
player with lower marks in AVG/OBP/SLG/OPS after the all-star game.
Its a tough call with Mora, but I think he should bound to
bounce back a bit, hes just too good a hitter not to.
I am looking to solidify my pitching staff for the remainder
of the season. My rotation is D. Willis, M. Buehrle, J. Garland
and B. Myers. I have P. Clement and R. Johnson benched because of
their recent lackluster performances. John Patterson is available
and has been impressive lately. Would you drop either Johnson or
Clement and pick up Patterson?
Richard, Nashville, Tennessee
Im having a hard time understanding how Patterson is
available in your league Richard. Why arent I ever in leagues
where these guys are available!
Currently, Patterson is 3rd in the NL in ERA (2.43), 12th in WHIP
(1.15) and 12th in K (145), not to mention the fact that he is 7th
in the league in BAA (.229). Sure hes only 8-4, but all the
numbers I listed in the previous sentence better those of Clement
(4.35 ERA, 1.31 WHIP, 126 K and a .256 BAA). I think those numbers
show that its worth the trade off in wins to grab Patterson
(7 Wins) and drop Clement (11 Wins). The real question boils down
to would you rather have RJ or Patterson in your rotation?
Lets look at RJ vs. Patterson based on their season numbers:
RJ: 11-8, 4.34 ERA, 167 K, 1.22 WHIP in 174.1 IP
Patterson: 8-4, 2.43 ERA, 145 K, 1.15 WHIP in 155.2 IP.
RJ has more 3 more Wins, but 4 more losses as well. Amazingly, Pattersons
ERA is 1.91 lower than RJ, meaning that if you added Patterson and
Roger Clemens ERAs together (1.56), they would still
be less than RJs! Patterson even betters RJ in WHIP, and falls
just behind in K. However, Patterson has pitched 18.2 fewer innings
than the Unit, so despite having fewer K overall he basically produces
them at the same rate as RJ with 8.4 K per 9 IP compared to RJs
8.6 mark. Lets take this comparison one step further and look
at the hurlers numbers since the all-star break.
RJ, with his back issues, has basically matched his season numbers
since the break (2-2, 4.82 ERA, 50 K, 1.18 WHIP in 46.2 IP). Patterson,
on the other hand, is one of the best pitchers in the NL during
that time (5-2, 1.77 ERA, 65 K, 1.11 WHIP in 66 IP). In the end
I would drop Clement for Patterson without a second thought Richard.
And for those of you out there with RJ in your rotation, you might
want to think about moving him for Patterson as well, no matter
how crazy that sounds.
Ray Flowers, a member of SABR and FSWA, can be reached with
comments/questions or suggestions at: ray@athomeplate.com.
Please also visit Ray’s website at: www.wildpitch.blogspot.com
for a plethora of baseball related posts and discussions.
|
|