| Point-Counterpoint - Coverage of Steroids in Baseball | | Print | | Send |
|
Written by At Home Plate Staff (Contact & Archive) on February 12, 2009
|
|||
|
The media's coverage of the Steroid Saga has been overdone and annoying.Ā They have constantly regurgitated something that has brought a negative light onto the game. ĀIt can be argued that the media's job is to report the story, regardless of what the story is.Ā I can agree with that to a certain extent, but the national media -- particularly the national baseball media -- love nothing more than to grab hold of a juicy story and do nothing but pound the topic into the ground.Ā With the steroids issue, they have done just that, and in the process, they have annoyed many fans. ĀLet's think about a timeline of media coverage.Ā What has been the consistent ingredient to the media's PED coverage?Ā Information about how the drugs could affect the human being?Ā Mildly.Ā Information about how baseball has dealt with the issue?Ā More than mildly.Ā A crazy desire for large names to fall into the vacuum?Ā Absolutely.Ā Think about this: the most coverage about steroids has been Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and now Alex Rodriguez (and don't forget about Rafael Palmeiro and Jose Canseco).Ā They want a story. They want big names to fill their headlines. ĀThis isn't about the soul of the game and it never was.Ā Half of those writers are brainless twits who vote for non-rookies for the Rookie of the Year award (Volquez finished fourth in the NL Rookie of the Year balloting in 2008; only problem was that Volquez was not a rookie). But people believe what they read. They always have. Many totalitarian governments used that to their advantage.Ā "If it's on the TV you can't trust it, but if it's in your newspaper, by God it's fair and balanced."Ā That's tomfoolery of the highest order.Ā ĀDo. Not. Believe. What. You. Read. Without. Question. ĀBut people pay for their newspapers, and that funds this sort of ājournalism.āĀ Even if you just buy Newspaper A for the classifieds, you're also unintentionally throwing your support behind the newspaper, who will then continue to employ their B.S. writers. ĀThe steroids saga, while ābad,ā I guess, is a nearly 90% media creation that has grown to incredible levels.Ā I shouldn't be angry about this. It happens literally all the time.Ā But, it will forever bother me that people will read about steroids and assume it's this God-awful crisis that could kill baseball.Ā ĀSome truths: We've inducted several proud cheaters into the Hall of Fame, including Gaylord Perry and Whitey Ford. Gatorade is a PED. Cheating, sadly, is a part of baseball and a part of life.Ā Is it okay?Ā No. ĀDo I give a darn?Ā No. Ā Media Does What MLB CannotBy Daniel Paulling ĀMajor League Baseball cannot police itself. Bud Selig, through his knowledge of steroids for much longer than MLB has had drug testing and his reluctance to do anything about it, has proven that point. ĀThe Playerās Union only cares about bringing in money. It compared steroids to cigarettes, downplaying the need for drug testing while players got huge and signed bigger contracts. The Union agreed to drug testing a few years too late, only after heavy demand from Congress and the public. ĀAnd this is why the media are necessary. In 2003, the names of players who tested positive were supposed to be anonymous. Through great investigative reporting by Selena Roberts and another SI reporter, Alex Rodriguezās positive test was uncovered. Writers like Mark Fainaru-Wada and Lance Williams wrote Game of Shadows, which presented evidence that helped indict Barry Bonds in the minds of the public. (To be fair, Bonds was probably already recognized as a steroid user before then.) ĀThe media have uncovered so many names that wouldnāt have been released. Do you think Rodriguez wouldāve admitted he used steroids after his playing career was over? Before then? He was more than happy to keep everyone in the dark about the entire thing. And that is why fans should be grateful for Roberts and reporters like her. ĀNow, do the media go too far? Considering that big names like Roger Clemens, Rafael Palmeiro, Mark McGwire, Rodriguez and Bonds have been tainted as steroid users, I donāt think so. These are just five players. Who were the other 103 who tested positive in 2003? Who else has abused steroids since then? ĀThe only way weāre going to reliably find out is from the media. We know MLB and the Union canāt be trusted to do whatās right. ĀDo the media go too far in reporting upon the steroid era? Let you comments be heard below.
|
If you like At Home Plate, you could show your appreciation by donating a small amount to our team. Thank you very much!
living room tables
essay writing service
have
Its fantastic how interesting it is for me to visit you very often.
This is very nice one and gives in depth information.
look for these kinds of blogs which give lot of information.
i get a lot of information from this.and wish to complete this job.i read from net about sorts,teaching and other blogs.
horoscope du jour
I had no trouble navigating through all the tabs as well as related info.
The site ended up being truly simple to access. Excellent job.
'cause I am absorbed in understanding articles.awesome..!!
the young generation day by day.Urgent Care In Round Rock Texas
corei5
Debt Consolidation
cash loans
cash advance
cash loans
fast cash
I have read the tips on your blog. I absolutely agree with your post here and I feel that you are on the right course, will be waiting for your future posts
Thank you for sharing.