| |
Serious
Baseball: Jim Edmonds
by Frank
Bundy III
November 2, 2005
WARNING: This article contains some statistics
that arent in the mainstream, but should be. Just a fair warning!
Do you know how good Jim Edmonds is? I bet you dont.
I bet youre thinking, Yes I do, Jim Edmonds is a really
good hitter, and a great fielder.
While that is true, I bet you dont really know how great Edmonds
is. Lets put it this way, do you know that hes better
than more than half of the center fielders currently in the Hall
of Fame?
To start to prove this lets start by looking at Edmonds batting
statistics compared the current Hall of Fame center fielders (that
we have stats for), in this chart sorted by On-Base Plus Slugging
Percentage (OPS):
| Player |
AB |
AVG |
HR |
RBI |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS |
| Mickey Mantle
|
8102 |
0.298 |
536 |
1509 |
0.421 |
0.557 |
0.978 |
| Joe DiMaggio
|
6821 |
0.325 |
361 |
1537 |
0.398 |
0.579 |
0.977 |
| Ty Cobb
|
11434 |
0.366 |
117 |
1938 |
0.433 |
0.512 |
0.945 |
| Willie Mays
|
10881 |
0.302 |
660 |
1903 |
0.384 |
0.557 |
0.941 |
| Hack Wilson
|
4760 |
0.307 |
244 |
1063 |
0.395 |
0.545 |
0.940 |
| Earl Averill
|
6353 |
0.318 |
238 |
1164 |
0.395 |
0.534 |
0.929 |
| Tris Speaker
|
10195 |
0.345 |
117 |
1529 |
0.428 |
0.500 |
0.928 |
| Jim Edmonds
|
5557 |
0.291 |
331 |
998 |
0.384 |
0.543 |
0.927 |
| Duke Snider
|
7161 |
0.295 |
407 |
1333 |
0.380 |
0.540 |
0.920 |
| Billy Hamilton
|
6269 |
0.344 |
40 |
739 |
0.455 |
0.432 |
0.887 |
| Larry Doby
|
5348 |
0.283 |
253 |
970 |
0.386 |
0.490 |
0.876 |
| Earle Combs
|
5746 |
0.325 |
58 |
632 |
0.397 |
0.462 |
0.859 |
| Kirby Puckett
|
7244 |
0.318 |
207 |
1085 |
0.360 |
0.477 |
0.837 |
| Hugh Duffy
|
7042 |
0.324 |
106 |
1302 |
0.384 |
0.449 |
0.833 |
| Edd Roush
|
7363 |
0.323 |
68 |
981 |
0.369 |
0.446 |
0.815 |
| Richie Ashburn
|
8365 |
0.308 |
29 |
1322 |
0.369 |
0.382 |
0.751 |
| Max Carey
|
9363 |
0.285 |
70 |
800 |
0.361 |
0.386 |
0.747 |
| Lloyd Waner
|
7772 |
0.316 |
27 |
596 |
0.353 |
0.393 |
0.746 |
According to OPS, Edmonds ranks 8th among the current crop of center
fielders in the Hall of Fame. That makes him better than ten others.
If you have read any of my past articles though, you know how much
I value defense and how I believe it should be included when analyzing
any player (s).
Now, we all know Edmonds is a tremendous fielder, but exactly how
good? To try and figure this out, I will compare him to the above
center fielders using Fielding Runs Above Replacement (FRAR.)
This is a statistic that measures fielding ability over at Baseball
Prospectus.com. Please click on the link to learn more about it.
Since FRAR is an accumulative statistic it unfairly favors players
who played for a longer period of time. To offset this, I have chosen
to divide each players FRAR by his total amount games played.
This will give us a rate statistics that will let us know exactly
how good of a fielder each player was, when he played:
| Player |
GP |
FRAR |
FRAR/GP
|
| Tris Speaker
|
2789 |
727 |
0.2607 |
| Max Carey
|
2476 |
556 |
0.2246 |
| Edd Roush
|
1967 |
429 |
0.2181 |
| Hugh Duffy
|
1737 |
371 |
0.2136 |
| Ty Cobb
|
3035 |
628 |
0.2069 |
| Willie Mays
|
2992 |
594 |
0.1985 |
| Earl Averill
|
1668 |
316 |
0.1894 |
| Billy Hamilton
|
1591 |
299 |
0.1879 |
| Joe Dimaggio
|
1736 |
306 |
0.1763 |
| Jim Edmonds
|
1587 |
263 |
0.1657 |
| Richie Ashburn
|
2189 |
360 |
0.1645 |
| Lloyd Waner
|
1993 |
323 |
0.1621 |
| Kirby Puckett
|
1783 |
264 |
0.1481 |
| Larry Doby
|
1533 |
209 |
0.1363 |
| Hack Wilson
|
1348 |
181 |
0.1343 |
| Earle Combs
|
1455 |
165 |
0.1134 |
| Duke Snider
|
2143 |
235 |
0.1097 |
| Mickey Mantle
|
2401 |
263 |
0.1095 |
| |
|
|
|
This is a true testament to how good defensively the average center
fielder is that is currently in the Hall of Fame. Edmonds, considered
one of the best ever to field his position, ranks 10th out of 18 players
inducted. Hes actually below average compared to these great
fielders.
Now we know how good of a fielder Edmonds is, but we need a way to
combine what each player did offensively with these numbers to get
a true measure of the total production of each player. Is there a
way to do this? Yes, there is, and its by using another statistic
over at Baseball Prospectus called Wins Above Replacement Player (WARP).
WARP is an all-inclusive statistic that includes what each
player contributed offensively, and defensively. There are three levels
of WARP called WARP1,
WARP2,
and WARP3.
WARP1 is a measurement of Wins Above Replacement Player with
no adjustments for difficulty/ or competition of the league they played
in.
WARP2 is WARP1 adjusted for the difficulty/competition of the
league that the player played in, compared to the overall difficulty
of all leagues since the beginning of baseball. This puts all players
on the same playing field, from all eras.
WARP3 is WARP2 expanded to 162 games to compensate for shortened
seasons.
Since WARP3 is era-adjusted we can compare players of different eras,
which luckily, is exactly what we need to do for this analysis.
Like I did for FRAR above, I will make WARP3 into a rate statistic
since it is an accumulative stat. Also, as I did with FRAR, I will
use each players total amount of games played as my divisor
for WARP3.
Following is the ultimate table for comparing the current Hall of
Fame center fielders to Jim Edmonds. It effectively portrays each
players offensive and defensive production adjusted for era:
| Player |
GP |
WARP3 |
WARP3/GP
|
| Willie Mays
|
2992 |
207.8 |
0.06945 |
| Joe Dimaggio
|
1736 |
118.7 |
0.06838 |
| Mickey Mantle
|
2401 |
154.2 |
0.06422 |
| Ty Cobb
|
3035 |
194.5 |
0.06409 |
| Tris Speaker
|
2789 |
177.9 |
0.06379 |
| Jim Edmonds
|
1587 |
95.7 |
0.06030 |
| Billy Hamilton
|
1591 |
87.9 |
0.05525 |
| Kirby Puckett
|
1783 |
91.9 |
0.05154 |
| Larry Doby
|
1533 |
75.6 |
0.04932 |
| Earl Averill
|
1668 |
81.9 |
0.04910 |
| Duke Snider
|
2143 |
100.3 |
0.04680 |
| Richie Ashburn
|
2189 |
100.2 |
0.04577 |
| Hack Wilson
|
1348 |
61.3 |
0.04547 |
| Edd Roush
|
1967 |
78.2 |
0.03976 |
| Hugh Duffy
|
1737 |
67.1 |
0.03863 |
| Earle Combs
|
1455 |
53.6 |
0.03684 |
| Max Carey
|
2476 |
86.9 |
0.03510 |
| Lloyd Waner
|
1993 |
55.8 |
0.02800 |
According to this all-inclusive metric, when Edmonds is included on
this list, he ranks as the 6th best center fielder.
If Jim Edmonds retired today he sould be a shoo-in for the Hall of
Fame, and it would be a damn shame if he werent considered for
it. Like I said at the beginning of the article though, I bet you
didnt know that, did you?
Now I know I may have gotten a little complicated with statistics
like FRAR and WARP3 in those last two tables for you traditional baseball
fans, and you may think those stats are a bunch of bologna.
Well, if such is the case, the first chart contains more traditional
baseball metrics (the one sorted by OPS) and may be easier to read.
According to that chart, which ranks Edmonds 8th among current Hall
of Fame center fielders, meaning he is a Hall of Famer according those
metrics as well. Either way you look at it, with complicated new-school
statistics, or easy ones, Jim Edmonds is a Hall of Famer.
Betcha didnt know that, did ya?
Thank you for reading. If you have any questions,
comments, concerns, or suggestions, please do not hesitate to email
me at frnkbndy@yahoo.com.
|
|