| |
Serious
Baseball: What Makes a Good Relief Pitcher?
by Frank
Bundy III
September 26, 2005
What makes a good relief pitcher?
Is it a low ERA? Is it a high strikeout rate? Is it a low walk rate?
Is it a low HR allowed rate?
While showing a good level of performance in all the aforementioned
categories will help make a reliever good, the above
stats dont cover all aspects of a relievers job. An
extremely important part of their job, stranding inherited runners,
is not reflected in any of those stats; but really should be.
A statistic that does reflect this aspect is appropriately called
Percent of Inherited Stranded. This stat indicates exactly
what its title says it says: The percentage of inherited runners
that a reliever leaves on base. This is a very simple statistic
that tells a great deal about how effective a reliever actually
is. Yet you wont find this statistic displayed during any
broadcast of any baseball game.
As a matter of fact, Percent of Inherited Runners Stranded is just
as important to a reliever as his ERA, and should be displayed directly
alongside a relief pitchers ERA. I mean, there are
two parts of a relievers job:
1. Dont allow any batters you face to score (indicated by
ERA), and
2. Dont allow any runners you inherit to score (indicated
by Percent of Inherited Runners Stranded).
Shouldnt a statistic for each of these aspects be displayed?
Without displaying Percent of Inherited Runners Stranded next to
it, a relievers ERA is actually misleading when it comes to
indicating his effectiveness.
For those who are unaware, here is a quick review of how ERA is
calculated for relievers.
This example will set up the situation:
A pitcher starts off an inning by getting an out, then gives up
two singles and is pulled out of the game with runners left on first
and third base. Now, a reliever comes in and gets a pop out for
the second out of the inning, then gives up a bases-clearing double,
allowing the two inherited runners to score before getting a groundball
for the third out.
-In this situation, the two runs that scored are charged to the
first pitcher and credited on his ERA, while the reliever that gave
up the hit allowing the runs to score is charged with zero runs,
and no runs are credited to his ERA; essentially saying he pitched
a perfect inning. The reason the scored runners are charged to the
first pitcher is because he was the one that let them reach base
in the first place.-
This example shows how a relievers ERA is misleading. I mean,
it is blatantly obvious that the reliever in the example above wasnt
very effective; but his ERA (0.00) for the inning would indicate
that he was. By looking at his Percent of Inherited Runners Stranded
for the inning (0 of 2 = 0%) though, youd see that he only
did half of his job. You clearly need to see both stats to judge
his effectiveness.
Here is a look at the top ten relievers in baseball this season
by highest percentage of inherited base runners stranded; listed
with their ERA (minimum 35 inherited base runners):
***Obviously, the higher the percentage of inherited base runners
reliever strands the better he is.
InS: Inherited Base Runners Scored; InR: Inherited
Base Runners***
| Name |
Team |
InS |
InR |
% Stranded
|
ERA |
| J. Grabow |
PIT |
2 |
30 |
93.33% |
3.83 |
| J. Frasor |
TOR |
3 |
35 |
91.43% |
3.39 |
| V.Chulk |
TOR |
4 |
36 |
88.89% |
3.5 |
| R. Rincon |
OAK |
10 |
68 |
85.29% |
4.54 |
| S. Eyre |
SFG |
11 |
72 |
84.72% |
2.8 |
| S. Sauerbeck |
CLE |
7 |
45 |
84.44% |
3.34 |
| R. Cormier |
PHI |
5 |
31 |
83.87% |
6.07 |
| K. Wunsch |
LAD |
6 |
36 |
83.33% |
4.56 |
| B. Howry |
CLE |
6 |
33 |
81.82% |
2.43 |
| D. Baez |
TBD |
6 |
31 |
80.65% |
2.86 |
Here is the bottom ten relievers in baseball according to highest
percentage of inherited base runners stranded (minimum 35 inherited
base runners):
| Name |
Team |
InS |
InR |
% Stranded
|
ERA |
| Shouse |
TEX |
20 |
49 |
59.18% |
5.62 |
| Sisco |
KCR |
20 |
47 |
57.45% |
2.85 |
| Romero |
MIN |
18 |
42 |
57.14% |
3.58 |
| R. White |
PIT |
18 |
41 |
56.10% |
3.63 |
| Camp |
KCR |
14 |
31 |
54.84% |
6.54 |
| M. Wood |
KCR |
15 |
30 |
50.00% |
3.94 |
| L. Carter |
TBD |
15 |
30 |
50.00% |
5.17 |
| Gordon |
NYY |
17 |
32 |
46.88% |
2.56 |
| Koplove |
ARI |
17 |
31 |
45.16% |
5.07 |
| Timlin |
BOS |
18 |
32 |
43.75% |
2.26 |
Looking at those lists, both of which show the two essential
stats (Percent of Inherited Runners Stranded and ERA), you can clearly
see which relievers are effective and which ones arent. Those
pitchers with a low ERA and a high percentage of Inherited
Runners Stranded are the truly effective relievers (ex. John Grabow,
Scott Eyre).
The interesting thing about these lists though is how it unmasks
the frauds. The frauds being those pitchers
that have microscopic ERAs but allow a large amount of inherited
runners to score. The frauds include Red Sox reliever
Mike Timlin, Yankees reliever Tom Gordon, and Royals reliever Andrew
Sisco. All three of them are perfect examples of relievers that
are only doing half of their job, but since ERA is the statistic
thats displayed during ballgames, they are seen in the public
eye as great relievers.
This is 100% unfair to the truly effective relievers like John Grabow,
and Jason Frasor.
So now I choose to use this opportunity as a writer in a public
forum to beg television stations, to display this simple, yet very
telling statistic next to a relievers ERA during games. It is very
easy to calculate, and very easy to understand.
This will make it so that Yankee fans dont think Tom Gordon
is the next Rollie Fingers, and so that Red Sox fans dont
think Mike Timlin is the next Dennis Eckersley.
While networks do not want to display statistics that are too complicated
for fear of losing readers/viewers, this stat doesnt fit that
category and can very simply be displayed and understood. By not
showing this statistic alongside a relievers ERA all you are
doing is leaving the baseball public ignorant to a part of the game
that is of utmost importance.
This stat will not scare away viewers. It will only enlighten us.
PLEASE, Im begging you.
Thank you for reading. If you have any questions,
comments, concerns, or suggestions, please do not hesitate to email
me at frnkbndy@yahoo.com.
|
|